When researching for music magazine contents pages, I saw this. In some ways, I thought this was a good contents page as it has a clear picture of the artist on the side. It also contains all of the information that is beside the picture of the artist with clear number of what page it is on.
However, in many ways I do not think that this magazine contents page is a strong one, as it does not say anywhere that it is a contents page and if it does, it is not very clear. In addition, the colour of the writing blends in with the background apart from the yellow writing. It also seems quite dim and there could be a lot more to improve on the contents page.
I also saw this contents page when researching. I prefer this contents page as it has a clear title saying it is the contents page. It also has all of the information needed with the numbers next to them. In addition, the colour of the writing is clear and easy to read with the background. In addition, the picture next to the writing is big and clear like the previous contents page.
However, with this contents page I do not actually think it look like a contents page, I feel it looks more like a poster. In addition, even though the title is easy to see, it is not very easy to read, as the letters seem to be jumbled up.
I also saw this contents page when researching. I prefer this contents page a lot more than the other two as this is clearly a contents page. This is because it clearly has ‘contents’written on the top of the page and it has a clear picture of an artist that takes up most of the page. It also has another picture at the bottom of the page to make it seem more interesting. It also has all the writing beside of the picture with the number showing which page it is on. The different sizes of the writing show, which is more important and makes it look more interesting.
However, I do feel that this contents page seems to be a bit overcrowded with writing at the bottom as well on the side.
No comments:
Post a Comment